What?
The title says Streamer (who you don want to talk about) stops due to grief (which has not been identified in the video).
Whats the issue with the thread being mistitled?
What?
The title says Streamer (who you don want to talk about) stops due to grief (which has not been identified in the video).
Whats the issue with the thread being mistitled?
Here: Streamer stops due to grief - #257 by Xuixien
And here: Streamer stops due to grief - #256 by Io_Koval
And here: Streamer stops due to grief - #265 by Ramona_McCandless
And here: Streamer stops due to grief - #268 by Apo_Bong
Youâre getting absolutely wafflestomped in this thread dude. You should reflect on that.
Until later, see you.
I was callous? lol care to quote me?
pretty sure I called for those players to be banned & said its not an ok thing
You can take away what you like from this thread however I will once again direct you to my answer
This is about harassment
sorry? I am getting wafflestomped in a discussion? o.O confused face
I donât get what you mean?
Actually it literally is the topic
In my experience, when a thread of this sort goes the way this one has, I feel that certain truths are exposed that may otherwise remain hidden.
The first of these is that the original poster often will not tolerate being anything but the chairman of the meeting, in fact is under the impression the thread belongs to them in some way.
The second is that there is no tolerating of investigation into what and why. The position that is presented is absolute (Example: Greifing is bad and must stop) but malleable enough to mean many things. However, the OP will use this to decry any challenge as Off Topic, which is helped by the topic being unclear (Example: âGriefingâ as an ill defined entity).
The third is that the only form of âdiscussionâ the creator of the thread will tolerate is one on the various ways to punish, torture or drive out those they determine as unwanted (Example: âGriefersâ). And thanks to the amorphous designation and determination of the unwanted, they can be anyone the OP doesnt like.
maybe or i am just tired of hearing about people getting swatted etc
also I donât see the point in making a post & not replying to it that was why I created it
Happen much does it?
Or do you just hear about it?
I hear about a lot of things.
Doesnt mean they happen.
can I answer without being accused of being over reaching my chairman powers?
It can be tho.
Re-read what I wrote earlier until you understand it.
The main difference here is he chose to stream. He put the target on.
Mm no he clearly explained the difference. Either you arenât that bright or are deliberately trolling at this point.
Bruh Iâm from America. That should tell you everything LOL.
Dude hateless should have been stoked. Adrien is an EVE celeb too LOL.
Chip truth omae.
The rules do enforce things. Adrien broke none of them ROFL.
Nope he is actually saying the opposite. But you knew that Arguing in bad faith again LOL.
Aw man. This gave it away bro. You gotta work harder if youâre gonna troll.
This also gave it away. Youâre getting too far a field from the topic my boy and trying to incorporate what others have brought in.
I get it, you tried to troll and bit off more than you could chew
If you were accused, why would you care?
Besides, if your the chairman, your powers are absolute.
Good point good sense of humor
If you had asked me in 2002 if toxicity was that bad had I heard of that much I would have said no
now days yeah you hear about suicides & swattings a heck more often especially in these hard times
Either way we can all accept their are toxic situations in & around eve even if you dont agree with my post or even think I am being legitimate ---- I think thats a good take away
Yeah, but hearing about it and it being real is two different things.
If the situation is as bad as you say, then providing an example of the behaviour you are talking about should be easy, then we can talk about⌠well whatever it is we need to discuss ONCE we determine what the problem actually is.
Its wierd, where I live, there is no way someone could or would even think about swatting, its stupid, and the police would already know if it was true.
example from right here in this very thread from earlier
apparently they just âdeal with itâ which is completely messed up for any game I was hoping more would come forward with similar stories but err⌠lol
same where I live the police dont seem to react that way
Well, he flew up to me in a retribution on 8/27, engaged me first, I killed his retribution and podded him.
Time stamp doesnât seem to work embedded, 6h19m35s.
I also didnât email afterward, which he âbet moneyâ would happen.
Ok well lets look.
First of all, this is an example of âhearingâ it. Thereâs nothing any more real here than if I said âWinston Churchill never did anything to the Dutch during the Boer Warâ. As every school boy knows thats untrue, but Id have to provide more than just me saying it to prove otherwise.
Second, while I dont doubt that Aiko has had threats sent to them, youll find a bunch of folk wont believe them because of who they are vOv.
I also dont get how it would be possible to carry out such a threat.
Yes, one hears a lot more about it, or claims of that nature at least. Thatâs the consequence of having the freedom of using the internet and its social media. Some cases are undoubtedly verifiable and real, others are unfortunately unverifiable, still others are false and only meant to serve some questionable purpose. Increased sensitivity to that subject is far from a bad thing, but only up to a point where it remains reasonable and verifiable.
The thing we all have to watch out for is for calls to curtail actions and speech in the âunverifiableâ category. Those would directly interfere with normal personal freedom and being a normal individual. However well meant and caring these calls may be, the danger they represent to the above is also real. EvE Online is a great environment to learn to make that distinction, btw. Not all âWOLF !â cries are warranted. That does not take away there are wolves, just far fewer and often hard to catch while theyâre doing their thing (meaning collecting hard evidence).
Anyway. I have loot boxes to open now. Good luck with running this thread
Nah bro you exposed yourself already dude. You just trolling.
Give it up LOL. I give it a 3/10.
This is the reality.
The gankers are not the griefers.
Highsec miners are toxic.