Test server taken away so stop playing omega

[Mark_Matthew]

@Gerard_Amatin

Practicing on the test server with zero consequences is about the most risk-averse a player can be.

You mean, besides ganking?

[Gerard_Amatin]

Ganking can fail, failed ganks still cost ISK. Therefore ganking has risk.

Practicing on the test server costs nothing if you lose.

[Mark_Matthew]

@Gerard_Amatin

Therefore ganking has risk.

I know you don’t believe that, but that’s never stopped you before.

[Gerard_Amatin]

What happened to the childish reaction you had before?

Did someone report it for spam or did you realize yourself emoticon spam was immature? I was tempted to do the former myself.

Either way I have given a very simple solid argument why I think ganking has a risk and have not yet seen you even try to refute it.

[Mark_Matthew]

@Gerard_Amatin

What happened to the childish emoticon spam reaction you had before?

Your friends removed it.

Ganking: High Reward, Almost Zero Risk – The Numbers Don’t Lie

Disposable Ships, Trivial Losses “Always flying disposable ships” is practically the gankers’ motto[1]. Suicide gankers deliberately use cheap, throwaway vessels so that any loss barely even registers. In fact, you can’t inflict meaningful losses on them because their ships are dirt cheap and easily replaced[1]. Consider how they operate in practice: · Low-cost hulls: A typical gank-fit destroyer (like a Catalyst) costs only on the order of a few million ISK. For example, a CODE attacke…

[Gerard_Amatin]

So if I read the linked chatgpt post correctly ganking ‘has no risk’ because gankers manage their risk well by using cheap and easily replacable ships?

You forgot to mention the risk of running into negative profits upon failing ganks by the way.

But even if ganking were to have low risk, how is that risk as low as trying things on the test server where there is zero risk of losing value?

I stand by what I said before, practicing on the test server is the most risk-averse a player can be.