You don’t want to falsify my posts by making falsification of reports about opinions which I do not hold true.
2ndly, those are opinions of doctors, and, not mine.
3rdly,
I do more analysis than doctors about information,
and, also, more analysis than the courts about information,
and, also, more analysis than intelligence about information.
4thly,
despite the level of falsification which is lesser or greater for anyone,
in regards to anything,
including zero,
And yes,
the vaccine makes people more vulnerable to spread it faster,
because it causes them to spread it while they are asymptomatic.
Furthermore,
if people can contract the virus mutations more than once,
how many times would anyone get the virus?
Additionally, is it better to heal from the virus,
than it is to never have it?
What are the risk of damage after 2 or 3 mutation,
if you never had it once, and,
never recovered from the internal change of the DNA sequence,
before the virus entered it (before the virus entered the system and modified the DNA).?
So,
as the virus mutate,
so does the falsification of report rates,
related to information report to the intelligence, courts, and doctors,
and so does the
falsification of report affect memory of those events,
as they also intend to morph those memories,
which memories would be lost in time.
~Time to die.
Also, it’s not good to accept to mislead into despair when harm occurs to people, be it your own country or other, for no good reason.
Then, if it can be Acting in the public interest, if the public interest in the disclosure outweighs the public interest in non-disclosure.
In other words,
if the public interest in not having the post is greater than the public interest into having them,
then it is better in not having them,
whether they are right or wrong.
In fact,
it is through this procedure that,
while maybe not better,
that they can be improved up to the point as to make it possible to publish later, in a format more beneficial to public interest, or, better,
to the public interest of those who should be informed.
As, communication is information, and, communication also is 25% of information systems.
Furthermore,
@lilsteel is only an EVE Online character name that I got on the Character Bazaar, with all due procedures accomplished duly and fully, and that I have never created myself.
Some of those posts are intended to show what is wrong with them,
and,
how falsification of those views can lead to more falsification,
which can lead people away from the truth,
by being shielded from the truth,
and not being able to defend themselves,
and, potentially leading to harm against them.
Prejudice to the safety or interest of the State
-
3 (1) For the purposes of this Act, a purpose is prejudicial to the safety or interests of the State if a person
…
(m) contrary to a treaty to which (the State…) is a party, develops or uses anything that is intended or has the capability to cause death or serious bodily injury to a significant number of people by means of
-
(i) toxic or poisonous chemicals or their precursors,
-
(ii) a microbial or other biological agent, or a toxin, including a disease organism,
-
(iii) … , or
-
(iv) … ; or
(n) does or omits to do anything that is directed towards or in preparation of the undertaking of an activity mentioned in any of paragraphs (a) to (m).
–
Additionally,
while it is good to deal with a potential with greater death than the normal death rate,
we are not getting more deaths from COVID-19 than the normal death rate is.
Sure,
the deaths from COVID-19 and those infected with long term effect exist,
on top of the normal death rate,
and are not included in those normal death rate,
however,
we did manage to prevent a lot of the damage which would occur if we didn’t take precautions.
Everyone wants their own perception of the medical fact,
which is not how they should go about to make money.
It can be fraud, and the financial crime units in charge don’t have the resource to stop the fraud.
All they can do is witness and report,
as COVID-19 witnesses those who don’t have the virus and reports it to them by infecting them with it,
to give them a sense of reality as to what it is to make falsification of report,
and to seek to justify it in courts,
as the virus itself does make a falsification of the DNA sequence of those same individuals type of specie,
by infecting their DNA so as to change it by falsification of the DNA sequence with adverse effect,
out of the control of the recipient,
and it is also designed to react so as to make it possible for the virus to integrate with other organism, which is uses as hosts,
so as to justify to make falsification of their DNA sequence,
and potentially kill them or cause harm to them.
–
Furthermore,
social distancing helps to prevent transmission of the virus in nearby people who don’t have protection against transmission.
People who are vaccinated with mask who already have the virus,
won’t be protected from not getting the virus as they already have it.
Additionally, people who are vaccinated with mask who already have the virus won’t be protecting others by wearing their mask,
since the masks are not intended to prevent exhale, but, only inhale.
Those masks would require an output containment, so as to prevent others to get infected.
Those systems exist, but are more expensive.
Perhaps would could work towards something like that in the future,
and I know those systems are used for certain application,
perhaps including
underwater welding, among other things
Also note that to discredit someone without actually improving the problem they seek to claim credit for themselves is not actually constructive,
and the level of construction resulting from it is rather destructive and fraudulent than beneficial to public interest.
I mean, sure,
it’s one thing to spread propaganda against someone when they are in courts and have to get an Apostille form for police work, and so on,
or, are asked for blood draw to get an Hepatitis B and A shot,
when it’s only used to gain time against them for the case,
but those same actions also are not protecting morals for the State,
and,
are worse than offense against moral, when they delay engagement for marriage to accomplish the marriage the are engaged for,
since it is a form of moral warfare,
which is not only more offensive,
but, also, a more dirty form of warfare,
and yes, against the State, and against the good moral of the State,
and promotes immoral actions and beliefs, and intents.
Add that to the costs for copyright registration,
to use the copyright to apply for patent,
for image recognition, and other form of security for intellectual property,
and, the cost of the marriage and sending the required info,
while, the intended party is unable to due to financial hardship,
sought to be caused by economic boycott,
in economic espionage against trade secret,
and, economic warfare, related to other acts,
than the security of information act,
in relation to those trade secrets,
which trade secrets are for business, and not for other types of secret,
and the intended delay sought and caused from the exact same falsification of report is the exact same delay they sought to claim,
and, that they actually use for assets,
such as those $14 trillion worth of assets from Chinese banks,
none of which are backed by the US Army.
What is wrong with my posts kind of thing.
If that is wrong, then, yes, it is wrong, however, I am not the one liable for it, especially not if and when they try to wrongfully try to make me be liable for it, and how they try to make be liable for it.
I have to design systems to be able to detect it, and,
register the actions with other authorities since those intending to justify those attacks against me also seek to set precedents for it,
by falsification of reports that it is good to the public interest,
when it never was and will never be.
–
We just managed to get better results with the vaccines,
which would be worse without them,
but I expect the virus to stop acting by the end of this year,
as it started around October or November of last year,
with the first visible cases occurring a month later after that.
Of course, we will be able to test more theories,
and the related ratios in relation to them,
however, the more details we get,
the more work it is, lucky or not.
SARS-CoV-2 will get worse until we get a better understanding,
and until that we get better practical behavior as to how to control it better.
By the time this occurs, the pandemic will recede or recess into more local epidemics, which we already start to see appearing,
which is a good thing in this case,
even though that epidemic are local pandemic, if untreated.
So, yes,
the reason hospitals get charged more for uncontained epidemic in hospitals,
is because it’s their jobs to contain epidemic there.
Additionally,
it’s normal more people get infected in hospital during the pandemic,
as it’s where the concentration is highest,
and it’s also where more protection is required.
Not the other way around.
People not going to hospital with symptoms,
and, hospitals being empty with costs paid for,
is not good.
We don’t need people to be too rich and cause death of the poor by financial means and control of finance against their needs.
People die when their needs are not met, be it the need to create,
which need to create also is the need required to have a child or a son,
which, when that need is interfered and not fulfilled,
the child or son is interfered from occurring,
especially when systems are used and designed to divert from the intended delay and abuse of control by falsification of report of attacks on trade secret,
which is information that the State is taking measures to protect,
which is attacked by people working for the State,
who did not do their job right,
and misrepresent their actions as if they would help,
but, could not,
while others sought to be prosecuting to interfere against what the State protects,
by making falsification of reports.
–
Additionally,
to create a false sense of duty by spreading false fears about lack of actions when those lack of actions are suggested by falsification of report,
is in no way productive or,
solving the problem of the interference against the need to create.
COVID-19 won’t be solved by fear and despair,
and, those who do spread those fears as a valid means to prevent it are not part of the solution but are the problem.
The reason they are not part of the problem only and the reason that they instead are the problem , is because that it create falsification of report,
by increasing fear,
due to their intentions to suggest that complacency is good,
and falsification of report about what is bad as if it was ok,
and to not worry about what is bad,
was how to solve problem about what is bad,
by misrepresenting what the problem is,
which does lead to errors and problems in the solution of those problems.
When the solution to the problem creates new problems and more problems,
first, you didn’t analyze the problem correctly,
and the scope of the problem wasn’t taken into consideration enough,
and the revising of the scope of the problem wasn’t taken into consideration enough, which led the solution to the problem to cause more problems and new problems.
Once the revised scope and analysis of the scope is more accurate,
then,
and only then,
not before then,
or,
during other things, while seeking to omit and forfeit other facts related,
which sought forfeiture has to be and will have to be held against those seeking it, and seeking them,
even as they make falsification of report that it is in the public interest for them to do so seek forfeiture, which interest of the public interest it is in fact not, and is in fact a misrepresentation of what that public needs,
by making falsification of what the public needs are,
and by making falsification of what the relation of help is,
for those same people, in accordance with what those people needs are,
not based on generalities only, but, also based on facts,
and, furthermore, based on specific facts, on a case by case basis.
Then, will the result of the solution be more accurate,
and,
lead to less problems,
and, will not cause other problems,
and, will not cause new problems.
–
2. - 1 minute later at 17:20 Wed Mar 3, 2021:
Imagine that,
me and my fiancée didn’t get COVID-19 yet,
while my sister who is an obstetrician for over 25 years,
wrongfully misinforms me that it’s ok for pregnant woman to have the vaccine,
and that nothing wrong happened to their fetus so far,
while it is not good to have the vaccine 2 years before child wish,
which is before the pregnancy starts,
which is written in the description of those vaccines,
that it’s not good to get the vaccine before getting a child,
until it explains why and how the vaccine is not good before getting a child,
or, as Bill Gates said, get the info for it in 2 years,
as if they try to use it as a Trade Secret ;
as for other drugs, which some people associated with the State,
who try to justify poisoning,
which poisoning I have to protect my family against and from,
since they don’t want to care,
and try to make themselves seem like if they can’t care,
while omitting how they seek to do so,
and try to credit themselves for being of good moral character,
while they are not of good moral character,
while they try to coerce people they target to be misrepresented as if being of bad moral character,
while I cannot let them try to poison my child, and which would be additional grounds for use to move and get freedom of movement,
even in COVID-19 pandemic.
The Hep A and B vaccine is not adverse to fertility
(if not, as, I just called the doctor and left a message to the clinic for the doctor to call me back to verify and update my information about the post on it, to post the info on my contact info with the files attached to it ;
– so, I got a call back, and there was falsification of report on my health card number code, which code was updated yesterday or 2 days ago, but was then falsified due to electronic warfare, and I had to give them the new code valid until next year back again, to solve the electronic warfare problem),
which I could now get for $40 or so,
instead of the previous $200+ to $300 or more costs which were offered to me before.
I was also informed it would take one year,
which year I will not have since I have to move overseas to Europe before.
YET AGAIN, a monthly review by the CPS has found that every single charge under the Coronavirus Act was unlawful.
a thread 
In fact, the wolf did not pose a danger at all, but this was beyond the lamb’s perception.
Fear & anxiety
Pierre Kory
Jose Iglesias
Eivind Vinjevoll